Top tennis players have once again united to demand significant changes from the Grand Slam tournaments — Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon, and the US Open. Their requests go beyond simple prize money increases, focusing instead on long-term financial fairness, welfare improvements, and stronger representation in governance.

Currently, players receive only 15–16% of total Grand Slam revenues, a figure they argue is disproportionately low compared to other major sports leagues. In their latest proposal, players are calling for this share to gradually rise to around 22% by 2030. This increase would ensure that a fairer portion of the billions generated from ticket sales, broadcast rights, and sponsorships flows back to the athletes who draw global audiences.

Another key demand is the introduction of structured welfare benefits — including pensions, health care, and maternity support. Players have suggested a fund of nearly US$12 million annually by 2030 to help safeguard careers and support those outside the very top rankings.

The movement also emphasizes greater influence in decision-making. Many stars argue that players should have a seat at the table when major decisions about scheduling, formats, and tournament structures are made. This comes amid growing concerns over player workload, injury risks, and the financial pressures faced by lower-ranked professionals.

Some Grand Slam organizers have already responded with modest prize money hikes — Wimbledon, for instance, increased its pool by about 7% — but players say these are routine adjustments rather than the systemic reform they are seeking. Resistance remains strong among federations reluctant to surrender revenue or power.

If successful, this player-driven push could reshape the economics and governance of professional tennis. A higher revenue share and better welfare structures would not only benefit superstars but also improve sustainability for lower-ranked players, ensuring that tennis remains a viable career path for more athletes. It may also set a precedent for other tournaments and sports to rethink how revenue and responsibilities are shared between organizers and athletes.